Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04059
Original file (BC 2014 04059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04059

  					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His ability to transfer any/all remaining Post 9/11 GI Bill 
Education Benefits to his daughter be restored.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 20 Jul 09, he requested Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) 
to his daughter.  The ability to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill 
education benefits was a new program at the time and he was 
unfamiliar with the policies and procedures of the program. 
Based on DoDI 1341.14, he believed he could modify or revoke the 
benefit at any time.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 3 Jun 83.  

On 5 Jan 11, he signed his pre-separation checklist indicating 
“yes” next to item 13a, “Education benefits (Montgomery GI, 
Bill, Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program, Vietnam-era, 
etc.).”

On 31 Mar 11, the applicant was relieved from active duty and 
retired, effective 1 Apr 11.  He was credited with 27 years, 9 
months and 28 days of active service.       


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating the applicant’s 
dependent child is past the age for transfer of benefits and 
therefore he cannot restore eligibility to his daughter.  The 
record in the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) shows that the 
member assigned 22 months to his daughter on 1 Aug 09.  While 
the DoDI 1341.13, Enclosure 3, paragraph 3f(2)(a)2 states:  “An 
individual may not add family members after retirement or 
separation from the Military Services but may modify the number 
of months of transferred entitlement or revoke transfer of 
entitlement after retirement or separation for those family 
members who have received transferred benefits prior to 
separation or retirement.”  The child receiving those benefits 
has to have those benefits transferred prior to age 23.  AFI 36-
2306, The Air Force Education Service Program, Attachment 9, 
paragraph A9.18.2.2.1 states:  “who is under twenty-three years 
of age.”

Additionally, the MilConnect website under Q&A states:  
Question:  Who is eligible to receive transferred education 
benefits?  Answer:  Service members may transfer Post-9/11 GI 
Bill benefits to:

	1.The Service member’s spouse
	2.One or more of the Service member’s children
	3.Any combination of the spouse and children

	-Children must be enrolled in DEERS to receive transferred 
benefits.  Children age 18 through 20 are eligible to 
receive transferred benefits as are children who are 21 or 
22 if full-time student status is established.  The new 
TRICARE Young Adult (TYA) program does not extend the age by 
which the benefit must be transferred.
	-Children age 21 through 22 years old who are attending 
school less than full time, or enrolled in on-the-job 
training, apprenticeships or non-college degree programs, 
may still be eligible to receive transferred benefits even 
though TEB application may reflect that they are ineligible.  
Contact your TEB Service Representative for more 
information.  Please see the Education tab->Transfer of 
Education Benefits (TEB)->Contact Us for a list of Service 
contacts.  
	-Children may not use the benefit after age 26.  

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 6 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to transfer Post-
9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter, we do not 
believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.  


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04059 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 27 Oct 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 15.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00761

    Original file (BC-2012-00761.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member’s ADSC waiver request is not in the best interest of the Air Force. It is in the best interest of the Air Force and his daughter to approve his request, which will allow him to retire upon completion of 20 years of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02546

    Original file (BC 2013 02546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02602

    Original file (BC-2012-02602.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the applicant has provided documentation substantiating he was approved for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) for one of his dependent daughters prior to his active duty retirement in October 2009. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 October 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00662

    Original file (BC 2014 00662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Several of his retired veteran friends have transferred their Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their children within months of their retirement or even after retirement with no additional service commitment required. He feels the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he was not aware of the ability to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits until speaking with several of his retired friends across the country. We took notice of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00064

    Original file (BC 2014 00064 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. DPSIT recommends the applicant’s request for TEB be approved effective 1 Jun 10, the date the VA Form 22-1990 was submitted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02659

    Original file (BC 2013 02659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was medically retired at 19 years; done wrong by the Air Force; and now they are taking his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits that he is entitled to. He was instructed to complete the three extra years and the TEB would be approved. It is unacceptable for DPSIT to deny his request when he served the additional time that is required for approval.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01506

    Original file (BC 2012 01506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While you may revoke your transfer at any time, a revocation DOES NOT automatically cancel the associated Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC), EVEN IF BENEFITS HAVE NOT BEEN USED. It would be an injustice to force him to serve this ADSC when the SOU specifically states that he may revoke his election at any time and his family and he used absolutely no benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission to include his rebuttal statement, in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01867

    Original file (BC-2012-01867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits from one of his dependents to another. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits...